The Court of Appeal, Abuja Division has reserved judgment in an appeal brought by the Oyo Governor, Seyi Makinde and some principal officers of the State against an order of an Abuja High Court ordering them to pay the outstanding balance of N3,374,889,425.60 from the N4,874,889,425.60 debt, arising from a May 7, 2021 judgement of the Supreme Court.
At the commencement of proceedings in the appeal, marked: CA/ABJ/CV/595/2023, a three-member panel of the court, presided by Justice Haruna Tsammani asked appellants’ counsel, Ayodele Akintunde (SAN) if he thought it was proper for the Court of Appeal to sit and review a case that had been decided by the Supreme Court.
The court also asked Akintunde about the time limit given by the Supreme Court, within which the Oyo State Governor and other appellants were to fully pay the judgment debt.
The appellate court also questioned the competence of a motion by the appellants seeking to be allowed to pay the debt by instalment, noting that the appeal itself is against a similar installment payment arrangement ordered by the Abuja High Court.
Responding, Akintunde said the Supreme Court actually ordered the Oyo State Government to pay within three months, adding that, the appeal did not directly touch on the judgment by the apex court, and that the judgement was no longer that of the Supreme Court, but that of the High Court of Oyo State, which was later registered in the High Court of the FCT.
Akintunde added that parties have since compromised the judgement by taking certain steps.
The N4,874,889,425.60 debt arose from a judgment gotten against Makinde, the state’s Attorney General, Accountant General and four others by Chairmen and Councillors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) but sacked on May 29, 2019, by Makinde, upon assuming office.
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, declared the sack of the ex-council chiefs, who sued through 11 representatives, led by Bashorun Majeed Ajuwon, as unlawful and ordered the Oyo State Government to compute and pay them their entitled salaries and allowances within three months of the judgment.
Rather than comply with the judgment, the Oyo State Government paid only N1.5 billion, prompting the judgment creditors (the ex-council chiefs) to initiate a garnishee proceeding against Makinde and others before the Abuja High Court.
On April 27, 2023, Justice A. O. Ebong of the Abuja High Court issued a garnishee order absolute, directing Makinde and others to pay the balance of the judgment debt on instalment basis, beginning with N1,374,889,425.60 to be paid immediately.
Justice Ebong ordered them to subsequently pay the remaining N2 billion at N500 million quarterly, with the first instalment payable on July 31, 2023, a decision Makinde and others are now challenging at the Court of Appeal.
Arguing at the hearing on Monday, counsel to the ex-council chiefs, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN) regretted that 26 of his clients have since died from poverty and lack of funds to attend to their health, owing to Makinde’s failure to comply with the various orders of court made in their favour.
He drew the court’s attention to a letter written on December 13, 2021, by the Attorney General of Oyo State, where the state put the salaries and allowances due to the ex-council chiefs at N4,874,889,425.60 and pledged to pay everything within six months.
Adetunbi also drew the attention of the court to a letter dated May 8, 2023 written by one of Oyo State’s bankers, First Bank and read a portion, where the bank said the N1,374,889,425.60 belonging to the state, which was attached by the garnishee order, would have been paid if not for the pending appeal.
He faulted the appellants’ contention that it was mandatory for the judgment creditors to first obtain the consent of the state’s AG where funds belonging to a state or its agencies are concerned, argued that by their conduct, particularly on December 13, 2021, suggested that the AG consented to the liquidation of the debt.
Adetunbi, who said the failure of Makinde and others to pay the money was deliberate, urged the court not to indulge the appellants’ blatant disregard of the nation’s judicial process by dismissing the appeal.
After entertaining arguments from both counsel, the three-member panel of Justices of the appellate court, comprising Justice Haruna Tsammani (Presiding) Justices Mohammed Mustapha and Danlami Senchi, reserved judgment to a date to be communicated to parties in the matter.
. TheWitness
